The Supreme Court is about to decide whether to interfere in the election again
Ian Millhiser is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. He received a JD from Duke University and is the author of two books on the Supreme Court.
If the justices exploit the ethical loopholes they have provided for themselves, well, there is nobody who can even nominally ...
Trump’s Justice Department, during his first presidential term, declined to defend the Affordable Care Act in a legal ...
Following revelations of private memoranda and conversations between Supreme Court justices published in the New York Times, legal experts are warning that such sensitive leaks are "destructive ...
Supreme Court Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch will discuss his new book “Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law,” along ...
Now, it also may qualify as one of the most stymied repayment plans ever created. The Supreme Court on Wednesday declined ... favor of several Republican-led states that argued the plan ...
They told the Supreme Court that the EPA’s requirement that states design plans within a two-year period would be “impossible.” Given the agency’s history of regulation, the states said ...
Voters in November will choose the next president of the United States following a tumultuous ... of registered voters also opposed the U.S. Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v.
US Supreme Court's refusal to lift injunction on SAVE plan could worsen student debt crisis The United States Supreme Court’s decision, earlier in August 2024, to uphold an injunction ...
Black Votes Matter” claims when the legislature passed the map, it removed a minority access congressional district in North ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback